Suppose you are discussing an issue of the day with a friend, and they send you…a Newsmax or Fox News link to support their position.
How seriously do you take their source?
Even if you trust the source not to lie, do you trust the source to give an accurate, fair view? (omit crucial details)
Now reverse that.
Or…even if the article is reasonably complete and accurate… consider this:
“the New York Times headline “Nebraska Teen Who Used Pills to End Pregnancy Gets 90 Days in Jail””
Yes, she did use pills to end pregnancy (in the 3’rd trimester) and she was prosecuted BEFORE the new 12 week restriction…BUT….as the article itself eventually states:
“Prosecutors did not charge Celeste Burgess under Nebraska’s abortion law. She pleaded guilty in May to removing or concealing human skeletal remains, a felony. Prosecutors agreed to drop two misdemeanor charges against her: concealing a death and false reporting.”
And that is the issue. It is difficult to trust the media to even make a good faith attempt to get it right; after all, outrage is what drives clicks.
And..that is one reason I am in favor of academic departments (at a university) keeping their mission statements about their subjects.
I want students to trust what we are teaching. Yes, I teach math, and I want students to understand that my mission is to teach them math, AS IT IS.
I feel as is academia often shoots itself in the foot with the creeping of “social justice” stuff into the disciplines. YES, we should have codes of conduct and THAT is the place for social justice stuff. One can talk about affirmative action, but the current debate is mostly about the elite universities.
Social media
I think this is a great take on the social media wars, especially with the new site “Threads” and “Twitter.” Threads disappoints me; at first I was excited about it. But, well, as the article states, there has to be at least a little bit of tension to be interesting.
Now, I have changed; even on Twitter I just scroll past posts/tweets that I find silly. Most are of the “we, as a society, MUST do X and I am NOT ASKING…”, sort of the Angela Davis “I will change what I cannot accept”, as if they have the power to change things.
It seems to me that some think: “I REALLY want this, and I’ve made the moral and logical case for it” and that is enough. It isn’t even close.
And so..Twitter allows for me to silently laugh at such nonsense.
And to think of some of the stuff I’ve read: the country appears to be turning against affirmative action (and DEI programs) and yet some think that there will be “reparations”, at least on a natinal scale.
Reproductive freedom is under attack in many states, and yet some think they can DEMAND that the ERA amendment be added to the constitution (38 states have signed on at one time or another, but some have rescinded the support and the time given in the bill has expired; a new bill needs 2/3 majority in each chamber and 38 states….good luck with that).